Debian Med Project
Help us to see Debian used by medical practitioners and biomedical researchers! Join us on the Salsa page.
Summary
Bugs of task practice
Total bugs: 13
Open bugs: 9
Fixed bugs: 4
Links to other tasks
Biology 235 (2323)
Biology development 128 (1291)
Phylogeny 10 (120)
Cloud 39 (455)
Covid-19 198 (2178)
Medical data 0 (0)
Dental 3 (21)
Epidemiology 21 (292)
Imaging 207 (922)
Laboratory 1 (30)
Oncology 0 (0)
Pharmacology 1 (30)
Physics 31 (315)
Practice 9 (69)
Psychology 16 (150)
Research 0 (0)
Statistics 8 (12)
Tools 35 (230)
Typesetting 73 (629)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 0 0
important 1 0
normal 6 0
minor 0 0
wishlist 2 0

Summary bugs page of task Practice

Looking into bugs of this task is recommended*

Open bugs in dependent packages

1 important, 6 normal, 2 wishlist
1118518 gir1.2-entangle-0.1: installs typelib in legacy /usr/lib/girepository-1.0 directory
1118608 entangle: Seems confused about whether its API is public or private
1124257 gnumed-client: new upstream available upstream
1133066 gnumed-client: missing Depends: entries
1006686 libchipcard-dev: undefined variable in libchipcard-client.pc fixed-upstream, patch, upstream
1006687 libchipcard6: card.c leaks memory patch, upstream
1001387 Wishlist: Package Stone of Orthanc Webviewer
1130465 liborthancframework-dev: should the dependency on libboost-all-dev be versioned?
912119 qrisk2: please provide qrisk3

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

1133182 orthanc: CVE-2026-5437 CVE-2026-5438 CVE-2026-5439 CVE-2026-5440 CVE-2026-5441 CVE-2026-5442 CVE-2026-5443 CVE-2026-5444 CVE-2026-5445 security, upstream
1133270 orthanc: build failure with icu at cmake configure step ftbfs, patch
1045364 oscar: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1046238 qrisk2: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 18:17:44 -0000