Debian Med Project
Help us to see Debian used by medical practitioners and biomedical researchers! Join us on the Salsa page.
Summary
Bugs of task practice
Total bugs: 17
Open bugs: 7
Fixed bugs: 10
Links to other tasks
Biology 236 (2370)
Biology development 129 (1338)
Phylogeny 10 (120)
Cloud 36 (410)
Covid-19 198 (2217)
Medical data 0 (0)
Dental 3 (21)
Epidemiology 21 (292)
Imaging 209 (1048)
Laboratory 1 (30)
Oncology 0 (0)
Pharmacology 1 (30)
Physics 32 (330)
Practice 7 (45)
Psychology 16 (150)
Research 0 (0)
Statistics 8 (12)
Tools 36 (233)
Typesetting 75 (647)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 0 0
important 0 0
normal 5 0
minor 0 0
wishlist 2 0

Summary bugs page of task Practice

Consider looking into bugs of this task*

Open bugs in dependent packages

5 normal, 2 wishlist
1118518 gir1.2-entangle-0.1: installs typelib in legacy /usr/lib/girepository-1.0 directory
1118608 entangle: Seems confused about whether its API is public or private
1124257 gnumed-client: new upstream available upstream
1006686 libchipcard-dev: undefined variable in libchipcard-client.pc fixed-upstream, patch, upstream
1006687 libchipcard6: card.c leaks memory patch, upstream
1001387 Wishlist: Package Stone of Orthanc Webviewer
912119 qrisk2: please provide qrisk3

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

1129823 orthanc-dicomweb: FTBFS with boost 1.90 forky, ftbfs, sid
1129824 orthanc-mysql: FTBFS with boost 1.90 forky, ftbfs, sid
1129825 orthanc-gdcm: FTBFS with boost 1.90 forky, ftbfs, sid
1129826 orthanc-neuro: FTBFS with boost 1.90 forky, ftbfs, sid
1129827 orthanc-postgresql: FTBFS with boost 1.90 forky, ftbfs, sid
1129828 orthanc-webviewer: FTBFS with boost 1.90 forky, ftbfs, sid
1129829 orthanc-wsi: FTBFS with boost 1.90 forky, ftbfs, sid
1130465 liborthancframework-dev: should the dependency on libboost-all-dev be versioned?
1045364 oscar: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1046238 qrisk2: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 18:17:42 -0000