Debian Med Project
Help us to see Debian used by medical practitioners and biomedical researchers! Join us on the Salsa page.
Summary
Bugs of task bio-ngs
Total bugs: 7
Open bugs: 2
Fixed bugs: 5
Links to other tasks
Biology 239 (2466)
Biology development 130 (1353)
Phylogeny 11 (150)
Cloud 38 (455)
Covid-19 201 (2271)
Medical data 0 (0)
Dental 3 (21)
Epidemiology 22 (292)
Imaging 208 (1002)
Laboratory 1 (30)
Oncology 0 (0)
Pharmacology 1 (30)
Physics 32 (345)
Practice 8 (54)
Psychology 16 (150)
Research 0 (0)
Statistics 8 (12)
Tools 36 (233)
Typesetting 75 (647)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 1 0
important 1 0
normal 0 0
minor 0 0
wishlist 0 0

Summary bugs page of task Next generation sequencing

Consider looking into bugs of this task*

Open bugs in dependent packages

1 serious, 1 important
1131493 htslib: CVE-2026-31962 CVE-2026-31963 CVE-2026-31964 CVE-2026-31965 CVE-2026-31966 CVE-2026-31967 CVE-2026-31968 CVE-2026-31969 CVE-2026-31970 CVE-2026-31971 security, upstream
1131584 picard-tools: FTBFS: Test: Test method testCleanSam[1](simple_overhang.sam, 99M1S)(picard.sam.CleanSamTest) produced standard out/err: Ignoring SAM validation error: ERROR::CIGAR_MAPS_OFF_REFERENCE:Read name simple_overhang, Read CIGAR M operator maps off end of reference forky, ftbfs, sid

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

1105730 bedtools: FTBFS with make --shuffle=random: src/utils/version/version.cpp:2:10: fatal error: version_git.h: No such file or directory forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
1048396 last-align: Fails to build source after successful build forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
1126172 sra-sdk ftbfs with abseil 20260107 forky, ftbfs, sid
1128753 sra-sdk: FTBFS with glibc 2.43 due to ISO C23 const return types ftbfs, upstream
1105569 velvet: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: Fatal error: can't create obj/autoOpen.o: No such file or directory forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:17:41 -0000